Monday, February 15, 2016

Is civilization a good idea?

           In the Heart of Darkness, the company states that they are there to civilize the area but in reality, their mission is to make profit by using the people to get resources. I think that Conrad is trying to say that civilization is really superficial. It actually less thriving than everyone perceives it to be. The idea of living in a civilized country is truly appealing but it’s actually less stable than what society think it is. Sometimes, a society is so civilized that uncivilized society seems better to live in. I think that our society in so complex and has so much pressure that a simple life is sometimes a better choice. Our daily lives are so busy that sometimes, we just need time to relax. Another negative aspect of civilized countries is that it promotes wanting more power. In civilized countries, it very easy to tell the rich from poor. As this distance increases, more people will want to become the other end and that meant gaining more power. As seen in Heart of Darkness, wanting more power lessens the moral within an individual. Examples include the crew going with Marlow, the company and even Marlow himself. Real life examples can be people that want to get a higher position but do it by manipulating other to get their goal. Or people that lie to others to get money.

            Overall, I don’t think that civilized countries promotes bad ideas, I just think that it advertises civilization too much. There’s no best of both worlds so a society has to have its good and bad side. A civilized country does have good things, like development in medicine that enable us to have a longer life or development in electric car that doesn’t require gas for it to run on. However, at the same time, it adds more complexity to life. 

6 comments:

  1. I think civilization is always a good idea, its all in the way you attempt to approach it. In this story, I don't think The Company ever really wanted to civilize this place, it was just a cover story to let the world think that they were doing good for the Congo, but in reality they were doing nothing but causing chaos and disruptions in their country. They wanted people to view them as sort of a hero figure, when in all actuality they were trying to strip the Congo of their most prized possession, Ivory.
    -T'Nia Tention

    ReplyDelete
  2. I think civilization is a good idea when it doesn't involve imperialism. When Marlow asks the question, "is it possible to have civilization without violence and dehumanization," I think it is possible as long as the country themselves are deciding if they should be civilized or not. Once someone else takes over the land, it becomes violent and hurtful to people.
    -Rachel Robutti

    ReplyDelete
  3. I think development or urbanization would be better words to use, civilization is associated with the complete stripping of culture, and has a my way is the only mind set to it. Where as developing or urbanizing a place is improving society, while keeping the valuable culture.~Jaya Jugmohan

    ReplyDelete
  4. I feel that it depends on perspective as to what someone would define as a civilized society. To those of the Congo they are that of a civilized society just not as modern as that of the Europeans. The major differences of the societies and their lifestyle can perceived as savage and or civilized but aren't they both savage and civilized? - Rakasha McIntosh

    ReplyDelete
  5. I think it is almost impossible to have civilization without any violence what so ever. It is a vision that is quite difficult to come by, but with great offerings society may as well come around. -Melenny Gallardo

    ReplyDelete
  6. I agree with Melenny in the fact that it is impossible to not have any violence present in civilization, there are always positive outcomes to everything as well as negative ones. -Rebecca Jones

    ReplyDelete